Thursday, December 8, 2011

Draft Final Paper

Amanda Katko
November 30, 2011
Research in English Studies
Final Research Paper

            Reading aloud to children has been said to be one of the best ways to prepare children for their future.  “However, if we want toddlers to acquire a richer vocabulary then we need to turn to books.  In stories and non-fiction texts, toddlers will experience a broad range of words, expressions, and patterns of language that are not used in everyday conversation language.  This exposure to a rich seam of language will effortlessly extend your toddler’s command of language (Reid and Bentley 62).”  In order to prepare our children for their academic future, we must read to them aloud as much as possible from as early on as possible.  In English studies, reading aloud to children is significant.  The earlier one acquires the skills needed to succeed in writing, reading, and comprehending, the better one’s skills are for their future.  “Reading aloud to your child helps in many ways.  It: establishes bonds of love, opens doors, becomes part of family heritage, it is fun, builds the desire to read, gives educational advantage, and develops the ability to read alone (Cullinan 24).”
By researching information pertaining to a child being read to aloud will answer the significant question of:  how being read aloud to as a child contributes to literacy proficiency in a person's middle school years, high school years, and future?   I would like to obtain different perspectives, input, ideas, and facts about whether or not a person who was read to as a child had success in his or her academic future.  Many researchers believe that a parent reading aloud to children does improve many aspects of a person’s life in a person’s life.  This research will answer that question. 
For my first choice of methods, I will be using interviewing as my research method.  Interviewing as a research method requires a personal understanding and flexibility as well as the capability to stay within the boundaries of the procedure.  The interviewer must be able to understand the interviewee while at the same time remember that there are limits and must understand that interviewing is strictly professional.  When a person interviews another, researchers must understand how the methods they choose to use impact on the results that are obtained.  Selecting a research topic, finding appropriate interviewees, conducting effective interviewers, and interpreting the material appropriately is achieved and does not come ‘naturally’ as some people believe.  It takes work to obtain specific answers and information.    The interviewees involved are usually one-to-one versus group interviewers.   Group interviews may obtain a wide range of views, require more resources and are time well-organized, but require a different set of interviewer skills from one-to-one interviewers.  Group interviews require three to six people, and the skills can be acquired through practice and observation of others conducting interviews.  Structured interviews involve schedules where all questions are pre given and asked in the same order and preferably in the same manner for every interviewee.  Semi-structured interviews are less strict in format and involve an interview guide instead of an interview schedule.  Unstructured interviews are the amount to which the questions are open or closed, and depending on what the interviewer wants to find out, interviewers may be more or less prearranged.  When referring to the process, the interviewer must have a significant level of social and listening skills, since the interviewer asks, listens, and interacts. 
There is a need to be at ease during an interview, so it is best when asking questions to not ask the vital questions anywhere in the beginning; use the beginning time of the interview to ease the interviewees.  Normally interviews are recorded because note taking is disrupting; interviewees should take notes after the interviewer as soon as possible while the important information is fresh in the person’s mind. 
For my interview, I plan on interviewing two  people who are parents of children atleast 18 years of age, who has read to those children, and who know an adequate amount of information about their child’s elementary, middle, and secondary school grades and marks.  When questioning these two people for my interview, I will ask the following questions plus more: how old was the child when you stopped reading to them?, what kind of material was read?, was their great emphasis on the story?, what kind of context?, was the reading in a group or individual?, who were the participants?, what were the readers and listener's feeling about the specific book and towards the event and material?, what was the level of participation from the listener/reader?, were questions asked during the book or after the book?, were questions aloud?, etcetera.  Once I have obtained all of the information I needed from specific questions, I will ask the interviewee to tell me a story about a time that involved reading aloud to his or her child.
Not only will I interview two parents, but I will interview the two people who are the children of the two parents I interviewed. This way I can obtain information from more than one perspective.  I will ask the interviewees questions depending on what they remember about being read to, since they were most likely young.  I will also question them about their academic scores in elementary, middle, and secondary school.  My thoughts are that much will not be remembered and that the truth will be altered, but those answers are just as good because the answers are from what a young child remembers which does affect the child’s academic future. 
The location which I will be interviewing my four subjects is in their home.  I feel that my subjects will be most comfortable in their home, not my home, or any other unfamiliar place.  By choosing a place which causes the subjects to be at ease will increase my chances of obtaining the best and most accurate answers to my questions.  I chose interviewing as one of the two methods that I will be using to obtain my information for my research question because I wanted to acquire actual information from a live person who had live experiences on my particular topic.  Instead of going to the library to attain printed information from someone I do not know personally, I thought that it would be better to interview a person whom I know and who has experienced reading to his or her children and witnessing the success or troubles the child has encountered.
When it comes to interviewing, one must be aware and careful of ethical issues as a researcher because interviewing requires dealing with other people.  One key issue is gaining trust of the interviewees so that they will talk openly.  Once the interviewer obtains the interviewee’s trust, it is important not to break the trust.  Another key issue is to be sure to ask the interviewer for consent to use their comments and information at the time of the interview. 
I will be doing this research project to use when applying for a job for a ‘beginning of the school year’ job.  Also, I would like to give this research project all of my attention and when interviewing my subjects, I do not want to interview when the two have school work, so I would want to do this research project when school is out for the summer.  I would want to be hired for September, so I would want to have my research gathered for September.  The time frame that I would like to accomplish this research project in is approximately three months, June, July and August. 
For my second research method, I will be using discourse analysis.  I will be taking apart and examining the transcript from my interview process with my four subjects.  Discourse analysis will show unconscious elements of the transcripts obtained from the interview process. Discourse Analysis is a research method that is typically defined as the analysis of language further than a sentence.  Each person analyzing the same sentence has their own viewpoint and perception on what it means and what is behind the sentence.  My evaluation is entirely different from every other person evaluating the same transcript.  Perceptions and points of view are important in Discourse Analysis.  An important article in the book Discourse Analysis in the Classroom discussed four discourse analysis methods.  The first approach was by Smith and is the social linguistic approach which focuses on language and interactional units, including message units, interactional units, and sets of interactional units.  Goldman focuses on the cognitive approach which is looking at the transcript in terms of a model and how individuals use mental representations to recognize everything around them.  The model is made up of a surface layer, a textbase, and a situation model.  The third theorist Macbeth focuses on the ethnometholdological approach which is all about meanings, values, personal identities, what is right and wrong answers, etcetera.  The last theorists Carter focuses on the micro-ethnographic approach which looked at how larger cultural stories influenced the classroom conversation and what it means that they do.
For my research, I would use the social linguistic approach and focus on the literary language.  Once I finish interviewing my four subjects and attain the transcript, I will sit down and analyze two out of the four transcripts.  I will take one transcript from each group:  one ‘child’ and one ‘parent’.  I will take each transcript apart and try to find the hidden meanings behind what was said.  I will analyze the two transcripts in the comfort of my own home with no distractions. 
My reasoning for using discourse analysis as a research method is because I am doing interviewing as my primary research method and when interviewing, something I can analyze comes out of it.  Once I have my interview down on paper, I can break it down and look for hidden meanings between the lines.  I will not be using any subjects or participants for this actual research method because they are not needed.  They participants were needed for interviewing, but not to analyze the transcript. 
The ethical concerns for discourse analysis involve similar issues to interviewing.  The transcripts from the interviewing process are being used which are other people’s words and ideas.  I must make sure that I am able to use and hand in the information I obtained.  It is best to ask for consent from the subjects whose transcripts will be used.  It is best to ask the subject if it is okay to discuss the transcript with others.  I will have the subject sign a consent form that proves the subject gave me permission to use the information.  I will make sure that no names are being used so that the subject does is not identifiable. 
The timeframe that I have planned for discourse analysis is able a week.  This research method should not take as long as interviewing as a research methods because I do not have to work with anyone or plan dates that are good for me and subject.  It is mostly up to me and how long I take to analyze the two transcripts.  I will give myself a week to successfully get as much information out of the transcripts and analyze them as best as I can.  Again, I will be doing this research for a job offer, so I would want to finish before the summer ends. 
In order to find out the actual  thoughts and affects first hand from people who actually did the reading and witnessed success in their child’s future and people have were read to and experienced the success from books, it is best to use the research method of interviewing to research.  Discourse analysis comes after the transcript from the interview is completed.  Discourse analysis is what shows the unconscious elements of the transcript.  Because reading aloud to children is so imperative when children are young, it should be done.  “Recent brain research has revealed that the early years of life are more critical to a child’s development than we ever realized.  Children’s brains are only twenty five percent developed at birth.  From that moment, whenever the baby is fed, cuddled, played with, talked to, sung to, or read to, the other seventy-five percent of its brain begins to develop (Fox 13).” 
                                                                  Works Cited
Cullinan, Bernice E. Read To Me. New York: Scholastic Inc., 1975.
Fox, Mem. Reading Magic. New York: Harcourt, Inc., 2001.
Reid, Dee, and Diana Bentley. Helping Your Child to Read. London: Hodder Education, 2009. 62.

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Blog 18.. Research PAPER IDEAS!

discussion of research question, description of methods, relevant research.


RESEARCH QUESTION:
How being read aloud as a child contributes to literacy proficiency in a person's middle school years, high school years, and future? 


DESCRIPTION OF METHODS:
For methods, I will use the following:

  • Interviewing, I will interview parents who read to their children when younger.
    • I will ask the following questions:
      • How old was the child when you stopped reading to them?
      • What kind of material was read?
      • Was their great emphasis on the story?
      • What kind of context?
      • Was the reading in a group or individual?
      • Who were the participants?
      • What were the readers and listener's feeling about the specific book.toward event and material?
      • What was the level of participation from the listener/reader?
      • Were questions asked during the book or after the book?, Were questions aloud?
    • Tell me a story, please.  
  • Discourse Analysis, I will analyze the transcript from the interview I conduct.
    • The DA will show unconscious elements of the transcript.
  • WHY IS READING TO CHILDREN IMPORTANT AS A CHILD?
    • Because it helps children with their reading scores in their future
      • By word association, develops language skills, etc.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Friday, November 11, 2011

Blog 16

The research project that I think I want to do is on Children Bedtime Stories.  I want to get information for someone who has read to their children and witnessed if their child became a good or bad read, what kind of reader... I want to research information from a person I probably will be INTERVIEWING as to whether or not reading to children helped them as reader's in general as the child was older.  I also would like to gain and gather information from people who did NOT read read bedtime stories to their children and how their children turned out as a reader in the future.  I want to study this in the home of the person who I will be gaining information from.  I will want to interview the person most likely, not sure yet.  I want to study this because I want to find out if depending on how much a person was read to as a child if it influenced and how much it might have influenced that child as he or she became an adult.  


I know my word usage is a bit confusing.  I THINK THINK THINK I know what I want to do, but I am not sure.  Maybe after some personal feedback from Pro. Chandler, I will be more set on ideas!  

Monday, November 7, 2011

PLAN FOR REVISION FOR DA PAPER

I feel that I did better than expected.  I might consider doing DA for my final paper.  For my revision I will do the following:

  • FORM A BETTER OPENING PARAGRAPH
  • FORM A BETTER CONCLUSION
  • ADD MUCH MORE EVIDENCE
  • USE WORDS THAT RESEARCHERS USE SUCH AS 'A REPRESENTS'
  • REORGANIZE MY PAPER SO THAT IT IS EASIER TO UNDERSTAND..INSTEAD OF  WRITING MY IDEAS/EVIDENCE POINT BY POINT, I WILL MAKE A PARAGRAPH FOR VICTIM EVIDENCE, THEN A PARAGRAPH FOR REBEL EVIDENCE, THEN I WILL FORM A PARAGRAPH THAT COMPARES VICTIM AND REBEL AND THEN ROVES MY POINT TO MY FOCUS
:D

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Blog 14

*Discuss what you did well + what you need to work on for your DA essay.  Then indicate what kind of feedback you would like from readers.*


My focus and question for this Discourse Analysis essay is:  How does A go from being a victim to a confident and more outgoing person?  What factors influenced A's change and made her able to move from being a victim who was vulnerable, had no control, and almost abused to a rebel who was powerful, capable of inflicting damage, and going outside the rules? 


I think that I did well when it came to pointing out evidence for my focus!  EVIDENCE was easy to find for my focus but then I had to actually state how I think that the subject turned from a victim to a rebel which was hard!!  I hope that I did well.  I think that I did a pretty good job with the paper, but I am not sure if it is exactly what Professor Chandler wanted.  If it is, I know that I got down exactly what I need to do to write an DA paper.  It seems easy to do DA, but to write a paper on it is a totally different story.  If I did, I feel that this was a great accomplishment within this class.  I think I did everything that I was supposed to do, so I really do not have anything to say about what I should have worked on.  Maybe after I receive feedback, I will be able to answer that!


FEEDBACK?
I would like Professor Chandler and my readers to let me know how my organization was and if I elaborated enough on each point.  ALSO, if I did what  I was supposed to do.  Like I said before, I do not know if I did exactly what Professor Chandler wanted.  I would like to know if I stayed on topic and if I 

·         characterize relationships within a body of discursive data
·         discuss your characterizations in a way that connects them to larger discourses
·         explains those connections in terms of a larger argument or theory supported by your data

This is what Prof. wanted..and I THINK I accomplished that.  WE SHALL FIND OUT SOON :)

Also, if I did as well as I THINK I did, I will definitely do my final paper on DA..I know that makes Prof. Chandler happy because of the difficulty in DA.  But, she successfully explained and taught ME DA.. I just hope my DA paper shows that...

Monday, October 31, 2011

DRAFT FOR DA PAPER :)


Amanda Katko
Research in Language and Literacy
October 29, 2011

            Defining Discourse Analysis is a difficult term to define.  There are many definitions for this term and this style of analysis.  Discourse Analysis is a research method that is usually defined as the analysis of language beyond a sentence.  Each person analyzing the same sentence has their own perspective on what it means and what is behind the sentence.  The Chat Room transcript that I evaluated has two excerpts—both different from each other.  My evaluation is entirely different from every other person evaluating the same transcript.  The Chat Room transcript is conducted by S and interviews A. They speak about chat room experiences then, when A was young and chat room experiences more recently when A was older.
            My focus and question for this Discourse Analysis essay is:  How does A go from being a victim to a confident and more outgoing person?  What factors influenced A's change and made her able to move from being a victim who was vulnerable, had no control, and almost abused to a rebel who was powerful, capable of inflicting damage, and going outside the rules?  The Chat Room transcript has many points that prove A to be a victim and have many points that prove A to be a rebel.  A as a victim and rebel are shown separately; A transforms from a victim in the first excerpt of the transcript into a rebel in the second excerpt of the transcript gradually and somewhat noticeably.  In order to see the transformation, one must successfully use discourse analysis.
            A victim is a person or thing that is suffered during the act of something.  A rebel is one that opposes or does something that is not appropriate or called for; one who has guts, nerve, and confidence in what is happening.  In the first excerpt of the transcript, A is made out to be more of a victim than anything else.   First off, A uses the pronoun I more than any other pronoun; the pronoun I is used approximately thirty-four times.  Usually when some uses the pronoun I, it means that the person is independent and confident, but not in this case.  In this case, it symbolizes her victimization.  In excerpt two, instead of using the pronoun I, she uses we most of the time which causes an assumption that A has grown out of the victimization stage into a more confident stage (rebel).  A uses the pronoun we twenty times and uses I only four times.    In this situation, she is showing more of a confident side of herself, whereas in excerpt one, she is showing a fearful side by using I.
Another point that shows that A is a victim in the first excerpt and a confident rebel is when A uses the word dangerous when telling the first story in the first excerpt and seems to laugh and use the word funny when telling the second story in the second excerpt.  This is known as linguistic evidence.  She uses the word dangerous four times in the first excerpt whereas she does not use the word dangerous at all in the second excerpt.  When a person repeats the word dangerous, it most likely means that something is dangerous or a person is retelling a story from the past that still unconsciously bothers him or her.  In this case, A is talking about her experience with an online predator which was dangerous.  It can be assumed that A was definitely the victim and that this event still might be bothering her.  Because A does not use the word dangerous or any negative word in the second excerpt, she shows that she did/does not fear the event that took place. 
An additional piece of information that shows A is a victim in the first excerpt and is a victim to a confident rebel is in the first excerpt.  A retells the same story about the online predator three times.  Any person who is confident and relaxed enough to tell a story will not have to retell it three times.  Unless a person still thinks about or fears an event that happened in the past, will a happening bother him or her enough for a story to be retold more than once.  Besides the retelling of the story, it does not seem as if A takes as many turns in talking as S does.  It seems that S has to encourage A to tell the story.  This can lead to an assumption that A is nervous from her past.  Because she has to bring memories back from the past in order to talk about it, she hesitates.  In the second excerpt, it seems that A and S talk about the same amount as each other.  This can lead to an assumption that A is not as nervous as she was in the first except which also shows that she is no fearful of anything. 
            Lastly, in the first excerpt, A does not tell her parents what has happened with the online predator.  This can cause an assumption that A is shameful and guilty of what happened. 
All of these points of evidence lead to a large assumption that A goes from being a victim to a confident and more outgoing person.  There are factors that influenced A's change and made her able to move from being a victim who was vulnerable to a confident a rebel who was powerful.  Firstly, the fact that her parents did not know much about the internet puts her in a vulnerable position.  Anyone might believe that the fact that A’s parents did not know anything about the computer allows her have less power, but it actually allows her to have more power.  If A’s parents knew more about the risks of computer and the internet, they could have had more control over A, which would have caused A to have less power to do whatever she pleased on the internet including chatting with an online predator.  Because she had more control caused her to be more vulnerable and be victimized.  It can be assumed that this is one of the factors that influenced A to transform from a victim to a rebel.  Did A feel resentment towards her parents because of their ignorance of computers? A stated in the transcript that what happened changed the way she used computers.  She said that she was more careful and she was also strict on her brother and sister when they were on the computer.  She made it a point that she watched over her sister, nothing about her brother.  A’s parent’s ignorance may definitely be a factor that caused A to be more aware of the internet and computers and more of a confident rebel as she got older.
The fact that A was alone and used I in the first transcript versus the fact that A was in a group and used we in the second transcript shows that she transformed from being a victim into a rebel.  Being alone at such a young age interacting with an online predator is what caused her to be the victim.  Therefore, she easily transformed from being victimized into rebelling because of the group she is in while chatting with the pastor’s son.  A’s collective identity may be a factor in her transformation from a victim to a rebel.  Her sense of belonging to a group no longer put her in a vulnerable position, but a more outgoing and confident position. 
The specific usage of pronouns, linguistic evidence, retellings and the easy flow of telling a story, and turns taken while talking shows that A transformed from being a victim to a rebel.  Something must have caused A to turn from a victim to a rebel.  It was not the evidence that influenced her to transform, but it can be assumed that A’s parent’s ignorance of the internet and her connective identity caused the transformation of victimization into rebellion.