Thursday, December 8, 2011

Draft Final Paper

Amanda Katko
November 30, 2011
Research in English Studies
Final Research Paper

            Reading aloud to children has been said to be one of the best ways to prepare children for their future.  “However, if we want toddlers to acquire a richer vocabulary then we need to turn to books.  In stories and non-fiction texts, toddlers will experience a broad range of words, expressions, and patterns of language that are not used in everyday conversation language.  This exposure to a rich seam of language will effortlessly extend your toddler’s command of language (Reid and Bentley 62).”  In order to prepare our children for their academic future, we must read to them aloud as much as possible from as early on as possible.  In English studies, reading aloud to children is significant.  The earlier one acquires the skills needed to succeed in writing, reading, and comprehending, the better one’s skills are for their future.  “Reading aloud to your child helps in many ways.  It: establishes bonds of love, opens doors, becomes part of family heritage, it is fun, builds the desire to read, gives educational advantage, and develops the ability to read alone (Cullinan 24).”
By researching information pertaining to a child being read to aloud will answer the significant question of:  how being read aloud to as a child contributes to literacy proficiency in a person's middle school years, high school years, and future?   I would like to obtain different perspectives, input, ideas, and facts about whether or not a person who was read to as a child had success in his or her academic future.  Many researchers believe that a parent reading aloud to children does improve many aspects of a person’s life in a person’s life.  This research will answer that question. 
For my first choice of methods, I will be using interviewing as my research method.  Interviewing as a research method requires a personal understanding and flexibility as well as the capability to stay within the boundaries of the procedure.  The interviewer must be able to understand the interviewee while at the same time remember that there are limits and must understand that interviewing is strictly professional.  When a person interviews another, researchers must understand how the methods they choose to use impact on the results that are obtained.  Selecting a research topic, finding appropriate interviewees, conducting effective interviewers, and interpreting the material appropriately is achieved and does not come ‘naturally’ as some people believe.  It takes work to obtain specific answers and information.    The interviewees involved are usually one-to-one versus group interviewers.   Group interviews may obtain a wide range of views, require more resources and are time well-organized, but require a different set of interviewer skills from one-to-one interviewers.  Group interviews require three to six people, and the skills can be acquired through practice and observation of others conducting interviews.  Structured interviews involve schedules where all questions are pre given and asked in the same order and preferably in the same manner for every interviewee.  Semi-structured interviews are less strict in format and involve an interview guide instead of an interview schedule.  Unstructured interviews are the amount to which the questions are open or closed, and depending on what the interviewer wants to find out, interviewers may be more or less prearranged.  When referring to the process, the interviewer must have a significant level of social and listening skills, since the interviewer asks, listens, and interacts. 
There is a need to be at ease during an interview, so it is best when asking questions to not ask the vital questions anywhere in the beginning; use the beginning time of the interview to ease the interviewees.  Normally interviews are recorded because note taking is disrupting; interviewees should take notes after the interviewer as soon as possible while the important information is fresh in the person’s mind. 
For my interview, I plan on interviewing two  people who are parents of children atleast 18 years of age, who has read to those children, and who know an adequate amount of information about their child’s elementary, middle, and secondary school grades and marks.  When questioning these two people for my interview, I will ask the following questions plus more: how old was the child when you stopped reading to them?, what kind of material was read?, was their great emphasis on the story?, what kind of context?, was the reading in a group or individual?, who were the participants?, what were the readers and listener's feeling about the specific book and towards the event and material?, what was the level of participation from the listener/reader?, were questions asked during the book or after the book?, were questions aloud?, etcetera.  Once I have obtained all of the information I needed from specific questions, I will ask the interviewee to tell me a story about a time that involved reading aloud to his or her child.
Not only will I interview two parents, but I will interview the two people who are the children of the two parents I interviewed. This way I can obtain information from more than one perspective.  I will ask the interviewees questions depending on what they remember about being read to, since they were most likely young.  I will also question them about their academic scores in elementary, middle, and secondary school.  My thoughts are that much will not be remembered and that the truth will be altered, but those answers are just as good because the answers are from what a young child remembers which does affect the child’s academic future. 
The location which I will be interviewing my four subjects is in their home.  I feel that my subjects will be most comfortable in their home, not my home, or any other unfamiliar place.  By choosing a place which causes the subjects to be at ease will increase my chances of obtaining the best and most accurate answers to my questions.  I chose interviewing as one of the two methods that I will be using to obtain my information for my research question because I wanted to acquire actual information from a live person who had live experiences on my particular topic.  Instead of going to the library to attain printed information from someone I do not know personally, I thought that it would be better to interview a person whom I know and who has experienced reading to his or her children and witnessing the success or troubles the child has encountered.
When it comes to interviewing, one must be aware and careful of ethical issues as a researcher because interviewing requires dealing with other people.  One key issue is gaining trust of the interviewees so that they will talk openly.  Once the interviewer obtains the interviewee’s trust, it is important not to break the trust.  Another key issue is to be sure to ask the interviewer for consent to use their comments and information at the time of the interview. 
I will be doing this research project to use when applying for a job for a ‘beginning of the school year’ job.  Also, I would like to give this research project all of my attention and when interviewing my subjects, I do not want to interview when the two have school work, so I would want to do this research project when school is out for the summer.  I would want to be hired for September, so I would want to have my research gathered for September.  The time frame that I would like to accomplish this research project in is approximately three months, June, July and August. 
For my second research method, I will be using discourse analysis.  I will be taking apart and examining the transcript from my interview process with my four subjects.  Discourse analysis will show unconscious elements of the transcripts obtained from the interview process. Discourse Analysis is a research method that is typically defined as the analysis of language further than a sentence.  Each person analyzing the same sentence has their own viewpoint and perception on what it means and what is behind the sentence.  My evaluation is entirely different from every other person evaluating the same transcript.  Perceptions and points of view are important in Discourse Analysis.  An important article in the book Discourse Analysis in the Classroom discussed four discourse analysis methods.  The first approach was by Smith and is the social linguistic approach which focuses on language and interactional units, including message units, interactional units, and sets of interactional units.  Goldman focuses on the cognitive approach which is looking at the transcript in terms of a model and how individuals use mental representations to recognize everything around them.  The model is made up of a surface layer, a textbase, and a situation model.  The third theorist Macbeth focuses on the ethnometholdological approach which is all about meanings, values, personal identities, what is right and wrong answers, etcetera.  The last theorists Carter focuses on the micro-ethnographic approach which looked at how larger cultural stories influenced the classroom conversation and what it means that they do.
For my research, I would use the social linguistic approach and focus on the literary language.  Once I finish interviewing my four subjects and attain the transcript, I will sit down and analyze two out of the four transcripts.  I will take one transcript from each group:  one ‘child’ and one ‘parent’.  I will take each transcript apart and try to find the hidden meanings behind what was said.  I will analyze the two transcripts in the comfort of my own home with no distractions. 
My reasoning for using discourse analysis as a research method is because I am doing interviewing as my primary research method and when interviewing, something I can analyze comes out of it.  Once I have my interview down on paper, I can break it down and look for hidden meanings between the lines.  I will not be using any subjects or participants for this actual research method because they are not needed.  They participants were needed for interviewing, but not to analyze the transcript. 
The ethical concerns for discourse analysis involve similar issues to interviewing.  The transcripts from the interviewing process are being used which are other people’s words and ideas.  I must make sure that I am able to use and hand in the information I obtained.  It is best to ask for consent from the subjects whose transcripts will be used.  It is best to ask the subject if it is okay to discuss the transcript with others.  I will have the subject sign a consent form that proves the subject gave me permission to use the information.  I will make sure that no names are being used so that the subject does is not identifiable. 
The timeframe that I have planned for discourse analysis is able a week.  This research method should not take as long as interviewing as a research methods because I do not have to work with anyone or plan dates that are good for me and subject.  It is mostly up to me and how long I take to analyze the two transcripts.  I will give myself a week to successfully get as much information out of the transcripts and analyze them as best as I can.  Again, I will be doing this research for a job offer, so I would want to finish before the summer ends. 
In order to find out the actual  thoughts and affects first hand from people who actually did the reading and witnessed success in their child’s future and people have were read to and experienced the success from books, it is best to use the research method of interviewing to research.  Discourse analysis comes after the transcript from the interview is completed.  Discourse analysis is what shows the unconscious elements of the transcript.  Because reading aloud to children is so imperative when children are young, it should be done.  “Recent brain research has revealed that the early years of life are more critical to a child’s development than we ever realized.  Children’s brains are only twenty five percent developed at birth.  From that moment, whenever the baby is fed, cuddled, played with, talked to, sung to, or read to, the other seventy-five percent of its brain begins to develop (Fox 13).” 
                                                                  Works Cited
Cullinan, Bernice E. Read To Me. New York: Scholastic Inc., 1975.
Fox, Mem. Reading Magic. New York: Harcourt, Inc., 2001.
Reid, Dee, and Diana Bentley. Helping Your Child to Read. London: Hodder Education, 2009. 62.

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Blog 18.. Research PAPER IDEAS!

discussion of research question, description of methods, relevant research.


RESEARCH QUESTION:
How being read aloud as a child contributes to literacy proficiency in a person's middle school years, high school years, and future? 


DESCRIPTION OF METHODS:
For methods, I will use the following:

  • Interviewing, I will interview parents who read to their children when younger.
    • I will ask the following questions:
      • How old was the child when you stopped reading to them?
      • What kind of material was read?
      • Was their great emphasis on the story?
      • What kind of context?
      • Was the reading in a group or individual?
      • Who were the participants?
      • What were the readers and listener's feeling about the specific book.toward event and material?
      • What was the level of participation from the listener/reader?
      • Were questions asked during the book or after the book?, Were questions aloud?
    • Tell me a story, please.  
  • Discourse Analysis, I will analyze the transcript from the interview I conduct.
    • The DA will show unconscious elements of the transcript.
  • WHY IS READING TO CHILDREN IMPORTANT AS A CHILD?
    • Because it helps children with their reading scores in their future
      • By word association, develops language skills, etc.

Friday, November 11, 2011

Blog 16

The research project that I think I want to do is on Children Bedtime Stories.  I want to get information for someone who has read to their children and witnessed if their child became a good or bad read, what kind of reader... I want to research information from a person I probably will be INTERVIEWING as to whether or not reading to children helped them as reader's in general as the child was older.  I also would like to gain and gather information from people who did NOT read read bedtime stories to their children and how their children turned out as a reader in the future.  I want to study this in the home of the person who I will be gaining information from.  I will want to interview the person most likely, not sure yet.  I want to study this because I want to find out if depending on how much a person was read to as a child if it influenced and how much it might have influenced that child as he or she became an adult.  


I know my word usage is a bit confusing.  I THINK THINK THINK I know what I want to do, but I am not sure.  Maybe after some personal feedback from Pro. Chandler, I will be more set on ideas!  

Monday, November 7, 2011

PLAN FOR REVISION FOR DA PAPER

I feel that I did better than expected.  I might consider doing DA for my final paper.  For my revision I will do the following:

  • FORM A BETTER OPENING PARAGRAPH
  • FORM A BETTER CONCLUSION
  • ADD MUCH MORE EVIDENCE
  • USE WORDS THAT RESEARCHERS USE SUCH AS 'A REPRESENTS'
  • REORGANIZE MY PAPER SO THAT IT IS EASIER TO UNDERSTAND..INSTEAD OF  WRITING MY IDEAS/EVIDENCE POINT BY POINT, I WILL MAKE A PARAGRAPH FOR VICTIM EVIDENCE, THEN A PARAGRAPH FOR REBEL EVIDENCE, THEN I WILL FORM A PARAGRAPH THAT COMPARES VICTIM AND REBEL AND THEN ROVES MY POINT TO MY FOCUS
:D

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Blog 14

*Discuss what you did well + what you need to work on for your DA essay.  Then indicate what kind of feedback you would like from readers.*


My focus and question for this Discourse Analysis essay is:  How does A go from being a victim to a confident and more outgoing person?  What factors influenced A's change and made her able to move from being a victim who was vulnerable, had no control, and almost abused to a rebel who was powerful, capable of inflicting damage, and going outside the rules? 


I think that I did well when it came to pointing out evidence for my focus!  EVIDENCE was easy to find for my focus but then I had to actually state how I think that the subject turned from a victim to a rebel which was hard!!  I hope that I did well.  I think that I did a pretty good job with the paper, but I am not sure if it is exactly what Professor Chandler wanted.  If it is, I know that I got down exactly what I need to do to write an DA paper.  It seems easy to do DA, but to write a paper on it is a totally different story.  If I did, I feel that this was a great accomplishment within this class.  I think I did everything that I was supposed to do, so I really do not have anything to say about what I should have worked on.  Maybe after I receive feedback, I will be able to answer that!


FEEDBACK?
I would like Professor Chandler and my readers to let me know how my organization was and if I elaborated enough on each point.  ALSO, if I did what  I was supposed to do.  Like I said before, I do not know if I did exactly what Professor Chandler wanted.  I would like to know if I stayed on topic and if I 

·         characterize relationships within a body of discursive data
·         discuss your characterizations in a way that connects them to larger discourses
·         explains those connections in terms of a larger argument or theory supported by your data

This is what Prof. wanted..and I THINK I accomplished that.  WE SHALL FIND OUT SOON :)

Also, if I did as well as I THINK I did, I will definitely do my final paper on DA..I know that makes Prof. Chandler happy because of the difficulty in DA.  But, she successfully explained and taught ME DA.. I just hope my DA paper shows that...

Monday, October 31, 2011

DRAFT FOR DA PAPER :)


Amanda Katko
Research in Language and Literacy
October 29, 2011

            Defining Discourse Analysis is a difficult term to define.  There are many definitions for this term and this style of analysis.  Discourse Analysis is a research method that is usually defined as the analysis of language beyond a sentence.  Each person analyzing the same sentence has their own perspective on what it means and what is behind the sentence.  The Chat Room transcript that I evaluated has two excerpts—both different from each other.  My evaluation is entirely different from every other person evaluating the same transcript.  The Chat Room transcript is conducted by S and interviews A. They speak about chat room experiences then, when A was young and chat room experiences more recently when A was older.
            My focus and question for this Discourse Analysis essay is:  How does A go from being a victim to a confident and more outgoing person?  What factors influenced A's change and made her able to move from being a victim who was vulnerable, had no control, and almost abused to a rebel who was powerful, capable of inflicting damage, and going outside the rules?  The Chat Room transcript has many points that prove A to be a victim and have many points that prove A to be a rebel.  A as a victim and rebel are shown separately; A transforms from a victim in the first excerpt of the transcript into a rebel in the second excerpt of the transcript gradually and somewhat noticeably.  In order to see the transformation, one must successfully use discourse analysis.
            A victim is a person or thing that is suffered during the act of something.  A rebel is one that opposes or does something that is not appropriate or called for; one who has guts, nerve, and confidence in what is happening.  In the first excerpt of the transcript, A is made out to be more of a victim than anything else.   First off, A uses the pronoun I more than any other pronoun; the pronoun I is used approximately thirty-four times.  Usually when some uses the pronoun I, it means that the person is independent and confident, but not in this case.  In this case, it symbolizes her victimization.  In excerpt two, instead of using the pronoun I, she uses we most of the time which causes an assumption that A has grown out of the victimization stage into a more confident stage (rebel).  A uses the pronoun we twenty times and uses I only four times.    In this situation, she is showing more of a confident side of herself, whereas in excerpt one, she is showing a fearful side by using I.
Another point that shows that A is a victim in the first excerpt and a confident rebel is when A uses the word dangerous when telling the first story in the first excerpt and seems to laugh and use the word funny when telling the second story in the second excerpt.  This is known as linguistic evidence.  She uses the word dangerous four times in the first excerpt whereas she does not use the word dangerous at all in the second excerpt.  When a person repeats the word dangerous, it most likely means that something is dangerous or a person is retelling a story from the past that still unconsciously bothers him or her.  In this case, A is talking about her experience with an online predator which was dangerous.  It can be assumed that A was definitely the victim and that this event still might be bothering her.  Because A does not use the word dangerous or any negative word in the second excerpt, she shows that she did/does not fear the event that took place. 
An additional piece of information that shows A is a victim in the first excerpt and is a victim to a confident rebel is in the first excerpt.  A retells the same story about the online predator three times.  Any person who is confident and relaxed enough to tell a story will not have to retell it three times.  Unless a person still thinks about or fears an event that happened in the past, will a happening bother him or her enough for a story to be retold more than once.  Besides the retelling of the story, it does not seem as if A takes as many turns in talking as S does.  It seems that S has to encourage A to tell the story.  This can lead to an assumption that A is nervous from her past.  Because she has to bring memories back from the past in order to talk about it, she hesitates.  In the second excerpt, it seems that A and S talk about the same amount as each other.  This can lead to an assumption that A is not as nervous as she was in the first except which also shows that she is no fearful of anything. 
            Lastly, in the first excerpt, A does not tell her parents what has happened with the online predator.  This can cause an assumption that A is shameful and guilty of what happened. 
All of these points of evidence lead to a large assumption that A goes from being a victim to a confident and more outgoing person.  There are factors that influenced A's change and made her able to move from being a victim who was vulnerable to a confident a rebel who was powerful.  Firstly, the fact that her parents did not know much about the internet puts her in a vulnerable position.  Anyone might believe that the fact that A’s parents did not know anything about the computer allows her have less power, but it actually allows her to have more power.  If A’s parents knew more about the risks of computer and the internet, they could have had more control over A, which would have caused A to have less power to do whatever she pleased on the internet including chatting with an online predator.  Because she had more control caused her to be more vulnerable and be victimized.  It can be assumed that this is one of the factors that influenced A to transform from a victim to a rebel.  Did A feel resentment towards her parents because of their ignorance of computers? A stated in the transcript that what happened changed the way she used computers.  She said that she was more careful and she was also strict on her brother and sister when they were on the computer.  She made it a point that she watched over her sister, nothing about her brother.  A’s parent’s ignorance may definitely be a factor that caused A to be more aware of the internet and computers and more of a confident rebel as she got older.
The fact that A was alone and used I in the first transcript versus the fact that A was in a group and used we in the second transcript shows that she transformed from being a victim into a rebel.  Being alone at such a young age interacting with an online predator is what caused her to be the victim.  Therefore, she easily transformed from being victimized into rebelling because of the group she is in while chatting with the pastor’s son.  A’s collective identity may be a factor in her transformation from a victim to a rebel.  Her sense of belonging to a group no longer put her in a vulnerable position, but a more outgoing and confident position. 
The specific usage of pronouns, linguistic evidence, retellings and the easy flow of telling a story, and turns taken while talking shows that A transformed from being a victim to a rebel.  Something must have caused A to turn from a victim to a rebel.  It was not the evidence that influenced her to transform, but it can be assumed that A’s parent’s ignorance of the internet and her connective identity caused the transformation of victimization into rebellion.    

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

ADDITIONAL NOTES FOR DA ESSAY

My focus for blog 11 was not direct enough and was too general, so I changed my focus.  I changed my information on Blog 11 and I am stating new information on this blog.  My new focus is the following: 


 HOW DOES A GO FROM BEING A VICTIM TO BEING A REBEL?


First I will explain why she is a victim in the first excerpt.  I will include:
  • The word differences in each excerpt
    • I vs. We, the use of pronouns, she seems afraid by using I in the first excerpt rather than 'we' in the second excerpt
    • use of the word dangerous in the first vs. the use of the word funny in the second
  • Re-telling the first story in excerpt 1 which shows that she is not sure, she still fears what  happened in the past
  • A does most talking in the first, shows that she is nervous from the past
  • She seems to grow into a protector of her sister, from a scared girl to a protector of her sister
  • Her parents not knowing about the internet puts her in the position of a victim
    • she is vulnerable because her parents were not familiar with computers, if her parents knew about computers, this most likely would not have happened
  • Learning from her mistake of being the victim, watches over sister when on the computer
  • Less control
  • tone and information seems dangerous
THEN, I will explain why she seems to be a rebel in the second:
  • Thinks what happened is funny
  • uses of we, stronger, not afraid
  • Ch and A talk almost an equal amount, doesn't see like she is talking as much in the first excerpt which shows me that she is not as nervous as she was in the first excerpt
  • very outgoing, not afraid
  • more control 
  • tone seems fun, worry free

THE EVIDENCE/QUESTIONS THAT WILL MOST LIKELY PROVE THAT SHE GOES FROM BEING THE VICTIM TO REBEL:


  • Does her mother not knowing much of the internet cause her to be more of the victim?
  • Does this cause her to be more independent and able to grow from a scared child to a 'rebel' as an adolescent?  
  • Does the fact that her mom did not know much of the internet cause her too be more frightened or  not as frightened?  
  • If the mother knew that she was doing this would she still be able (most likely no) then would she be able to learn from her mistakes?
  • Does the fact that her mother not knowing about the internet cause her to step up and be more mature so that she can watch over her sister on the internet?
  • She goes from being a victim to a rebel because of certain things that happened

NOW I AM BLANK!!!

My problem is...how do I pull this all together so that I can make a point?  What is my point...that she is a victim and then turns into a rebel?  I do not know how I can exactly answer the question of H.O.W???

 HOW DOES A GO FROM BEING A VICTIM TO BEING A REBEL?  


I know differences from her being a victim to a rebel but.......that is about it.. HELP Professor

Sunday, October 23, 2011

DA FOCUS

I think I will do the chat room transcript for my first essay.  

I am having a difficult time trying to find something that is not obvious to point out.  I am not sure yet, but I think I might focus on:

HOW DOES A GO FROM BEING A VICTIM TO BEING A REBEL?




The points/evidence I will use is:

-the word differences in each exerpt
-re-tellings the first story in excerpt 1
-the use of pronouns, she seems afraid by using I in the first excerpt rather than 'we' in the second excerpt
-A does most talking in the frist, shows that she is nervous from the past
-she seems to grow into a protector of her sister, from a scared girl to a protector of her sister

Does the fact that her parents not knowing much about computers relate to her being able to do more on the internet?  Does this cause her to be more independent and able to grow from a scared child to a 'rebel' as an adolescent?  Does the fact that her mom did not know much of the internet cause her too be more frightened or  not as frightened?  If the mother knew that she was doing this would she still be able (most likely no) then would she be able to learn from her mistakes?

Monday, October 17, 2011

CHAT ROOM/ ADULT TRANSCRIPT ANALYSIS


CHAT ROOM INTERVIEW:

Excerpt 1
S    so how do you think you felt about computers (when you were young- in grade school/middle school).
A    I loved it - I loved it because, when I discovered what AOL was - that I could email my friends, put in little pictures, photoshop - all those things - and like chat with people my age - which can be dangerous
We didn't have a computer, but we had web tv.  Must have been in fifth grade.  And it was a slow connection and you could have a little keyboard, and you could, check your email, and you could also chat strangers - which was dangerous cause I think I talked to a pedophile I'm not sure, I I was in fifth grade I gave him my phone number when he called me I hung up I was so scared
S    what did that experience do
A    That was scary. because
S    did you tell your mom
A    no I never told my mom or my dad
S    we'll be careful if we publish this (laughing)
A    I mean, I think I told them later on when I was in college, but it's dangerous, cause my parents weren't familiar with computers or web tv and I was a child exploring it -like - there was no restrictions, my parents didn't know how to put restrictions, they weren't too familiar with it.  It's only maybe three of four years ago that my mom learned how to use a computer so being a child, discovering it on your own could be really dangerous when there's chat rooms, and talking to people telling you that they're your age, but they're not
S    Exactly
A    That was scary experience
S    But you figured that out, you knew to hang up when you got the call
A    Yeah, well as soon as I heard a deep voice I was like, that is not a kid, and like I think he asked me what I was wearing, and so I I was like, I'm wearing pajamas - bye, and I was like Oh my gosh, he's going to find where I live, my mom's going to kill me, so I didn't go on WebTv for a long time. 
S    Oh my.  So that was frightening. but it was also  - how did that change the way you used it then?
A    I was careful, and then I was strict on my younger sister and my brothers using the computer.  I also hogged the computer because I liked talking to my friends. But when my sister started going online I would check up on who she's talking to, I would look over, I would check the history, see what websites she went on
S    and how old were you when you were doing that.
A    High school.  I was in high school.  I was more familiar with it. And we started learning more about computers from the in middle school in high school by that time I was able to email who ever I wanted, and research, very familiar with the internet


Excerpt 2
S    so what did you and your friends do on the computer in a typical session - if you went over to your friend down the street
A    check our emails, check our home pages, see if people left us messages, go in chat rooms and chat with our friends, exchange pictures with people that lived in our area that was our age, which could be dangerous, cause they could be imposters, we really didn't care
//
A    I think paint came with our computers,  I remember eight grade we were playing with like drawing our own little pictures, um changing the backgrounds and printing out whatever we did on paint, and then it evolved into photoshop, and making my eyes green, and fixing my cousin's nose to make it a little pointier, and then sending it to people will all the photoshop, so we had a lot of fun
S    oh you did (laughing) you did
A    we would make ourselves a little thinner, and that's what we did though, I think half of our albums were photoshopped, so um
S    so how often did you use technology with your friends?

A    every time we hung out
S    every time, every time
A    every time, that was just our way of life afterwards
S    do you have a particular story about one one adventure with technology (laughing)
A    um, one time we were in a chat room, chatting, well my friend and I were like, oh lets go with that guy's sceen name, and then, he was like do you have a picture, we sent a picture, we found out it was our pastor's son who was like 20, and we're like eeuew he's like an older brother, and then when he saw our picture he's like why are you doing that, why were you sending pictures to strangers, and kind of got mad at us
S    oh that's really funny it backfired on both of you
A    it was kind of embarassing, we were like eeuuew, we go to church with him, he's old,
S    that's really funny, how old were you then
A    we were freshman in high school
S    ok so you were about 14
16
A    yeah, and he was bout 20, and he was like our older brother, too, and we were like, so now we know how you pick us girls, all these girls you met were from the chat room
S    that's really funny
A    that was a weird story
S    that's a funny story, and it's funny, it's like a reprise of the story when you were little, and you gave, but it's um
A    well this time it's someone I know and I think we lied about our age, too, so we said, every time we were 14 we'd at 3 or 4 extra years, we wanted to sound older (small laugh) and we would change our screen name so many times, cause we're like  'ahh, we want to have a new personality today'
S    laughing
A    we're like "pinkgirlloves whatever" or there, like our new boyfriends name, like Angelalovewhateverhisnameis - we changed it every week.   What can you do?


Features in transcript:

  • S provokes A to tell more
  • Indication that A trusts the interviewer by telling personal stories that scared her in the past, she did not even tell her parents
  • A does most of the talking, especially in the first excerpt
  • A retells the story three times, not just once
  • S asks many questions
  • A repeats dangerous a few times
  • When telling about watching over A's siblings, A only describes keeping a close eye on sister, not brother
  • First excerpt was more serious while the second was funny
  • The first excerpt had more questions from S as the second excerpt didn't
  • I was used in the first excerpt, we was used more in the second excerpt
  • It seemed that I had less power than we did
  • The second excerpt, S and A take more turns talking rather than A doing most of the talking like excerpt one
  • The first excerpt was more serious than the second one
  • The second excerpt.. every time S said that something was funny, A would go on to tell funnier things
Questions:

  •  What emotions do speakers project into the conversation?
  • Who initiaties new topics? 
  •  Why does the subject talk more about watching over her sister instead of her brother?  Are there gender differences when it comes to internet chat rooms?
______________________


ADULT TRANSCRIPT:
Excerpt 1
Ch        So in 2002, you were word processing, typing papers.  But in that math class you didn't want to use that math program
M         No
Ch        Do you remember why?  What were your feelings about it, can you remember that?
M         I guess thought that I couldn't do it, I didn't trust myself, I didn't trust the computer, I was afraid.
Ch
        what was it about your self that you didn't trust?
M         That I could do it, I guess I didn't think that I needed to use a computer in that way.
Ch        Yeah
M         I was willing to use it to type
Ch        yeah, and what was it that you didn't trust about the computer?
M         I guess that putting all of my information in there, and trusting the computer to, you know, analyze it, the way that I could have done it myself
Ch        So you didn't think it would ah,
m         represent what I wanted it to represent.
Ch        yeah.[ pause] now go back again, so what was it, what was your resistance, if you can remember
M         With the computer?
Ch        Why didn't you want to learn it?  The teacher says we're going to do the course this way, and you rather than learning the program they gave you, that was supposed to make it easier, and that's the course where they were going to teach you and support you to use it, you you did it your own way, and that  isn't just you, that's fairly typical, so let's do some reflecting on, what were your motives, I understand the fear thing, but let's think about where the fear came from, what was it, the one you identified, about not thinking that it was going to represent what you really wanted, is a big one, that's big, but can you think of any of the other things, maybe about you, or your past experiences or
M         Maybe I didn't relate the computer to education in the right way, that I didn't think it was necessary
Ch        mm hm, and what do you mean, like, didn't relate the computer to education?
M         I guess I thought I could go through without - without having to do this.
Ch        It seemed like something extra?
M         Yeah, and even though I guess I wasn't you know comprehending that this was supposed to make my life easier, it made it more difficult
Ch        And also, I think I'm hearing, if I'm understanding you right, you felt that learning that program didn't really have anything to do with what you needed to learn for that course,
M         right
Ch        that you'd learn more, or better, or what you wanted, by doing it on your own
M         mmhmm
Ch        So you didn't see the program as part of what it was important to learn
M         Mmhm
[I wish I had asked why at this point]
M         I was fighting it

Excerpt 2
Ch        that's very interesting.  OK that was your school experience beginning that fall. So then when you took the computer class, how did you feel, it was obviously different.
M         It was different, and ah, it was a fun experience because the teacher was very good, very willing to work with use, she asked us where we were all, part of the class it was you know, twice a week, once we would meet in the classroom, and the other time we would meet in the computer lab, so it was the history of computers, so we learned about the history of computers, and then it was the actual hands on, how we would use it, so and we had to do projects, each project, we had to do an excel project, we had to do a word project, we had to do what else, what other programs are there, we did excel we did word, we did (thinking) what's it? slides?
Ch        Powerpoint?
M         yeah powerpoint and ah,
Ch        frontpate?
M         no, I'm trying to think what else, but they were just projects that we had to turn in.  So ahm, some kids knew how to use the computer but they didn't know how to use it in the way she wanted it to be used, they would zip by all their work and not do it the correct way, and maybe I was in a better situation, because I knew nothing. about you know, computers, and this was my fear, entering the information and then you press a button, and I remember , you know, the laughed at me because you would press the button and everything on the screen would disappear and I'd be like "oh what happened" but there was a way to get it back, there was always a way to get it back, so it was a funny experience and it was ah, it was kind of taught me not to be afraid, to you know, to use the computer
Ch        good, so this course was important, in getting you over your fear
M         yeah
Ch        What do you think it was that got you over it?
M         Ahm, I guess what could happen, you know? You know, what could happen, you put your work in you press a button, and you just - what's going to happen?
Ch        So you had some assurance that your work would be there.
M         Right
Ch        that you knew how, that you knew how to what?  What was it that you learned how to do?
M         well I learned, well when I was typing on word I didn't know a lot of the different things, to use, I learned how to ah how to format, I learned different fonts, I didn't know how to use any of the pull down bars, I didn't know all of those things the drop down menus I didn't know all those things were there, I didn't know about the undo button, that's my favorite button the undo button (laughing) go back, go forward.
Ch        so let's go back to how you learned word when you learned it by yourself,
you had something you needed to do, right? and then you'd ask someone what to do.  Did you do very much exploring on your own?
M         No.  No if I had to type, I just went in and I typed I used it like a typewriter.
Ch        But you didn't go across the menu at the top and use the hover thing so
M         No I was afraid to.  I was afraid of breaking the computer. Or afraid of what would, I never explored, I went on, went to word, opened it up, typed what I had to type, and you know.
Ch        So your process of learning word was to go in and type, and then when you needed to do something that you didn't know how to do
M         Ask somebody
Ch        Ask someone, and then, how would they tell you, or what kind of directions did you get?
M         Ah, well like where us word.  I would type in Notepad, you know, and then maybe somebody showed me, or you turn it on, and I thought that was the only program and then somebody, don't you use word?  What do you mean?  You know, so , ahm, then I would go into word,
Ch        OK so, I guess then maybe that the discussions of the history of the computer and how they were organizred and what they did were important in that class
M         probably (but doesn't sound really convinced)
Ch        Do you remember
M         yeah cause when they, well it talked about, ah fear of computers, ah well and the realization that a computer has really been around for very a long time, and we talked about the internet and we learned how to find things, on the internet, and
Ch        What kinds of things - did they tell you how to get help on the internet?
M         I think so
Ch        Did you use that?
M         No
Ch        Ok, I'm trying to figure, cause, we've skipped all these other things about friends and growing up in school, so you had this one class and ah, so then, ah you bought a computer - how did things change when you bought a computer
M         I guess then I was little, my kids used it a lot more than I did, and I really didn't explore at first, and then I became more comfortable with it, little by little, then after I took that computer class, I took an internet course for the first time, I said, well let me try this, now that I, well I had to trying to graduate from Middlesex, to fit into my schedule, and then that internet course kind of helped me to build up my confidence, cause we had to do everything on the computer, answer all these questions had the discussion group and we had to answer all the se questions and he the teacher. It was an English course and he set up all these links to different things on the internet that we could go to, so I kind of explored a little bit that way.
Ch        So the internet course helped you to learn how to explore?
M         I guess so, how to research on how to use the computer for research
Ch        did it help you with exploring programs
M         not really programs, no
Ch        So how would you learn a program now?
M         Ask somebody
Ch        You still wouldn't go through the menu bar and see what each of the tools did, and you know because you can hover over it, or you wouldn't open them up and just play with it
M         I might, but I would probably ask somebody
Ch        Would you read somethihg
M         I would read, yeah.  I would read the help things

  • Negative contractions are used a lot
  • Even amount of turns talking
  • Ch talks A LOT, much more than M, seems as if he does not have much to say
  • Ch had to explain what she wanted specifically out of M
  • Says I GUESS a lot
  • In the second excerpt, M talks more than Ch
  • Seemed like Ch was 'begging' for answers from M
  • Does not seem into the interview, seems as if Ch is doing most of the work
Questions: 
  • What strategies get the subject to talk?
  • Why isn't the subject so quite?
  • Do speakers seem to share the same assumptions?